- A number of problems can be solved only truly global. Take for example the philosophy of Gandhi: non-violence. Has borne fruit in certain historical conditions, but in general non-violence is dangerous for a country. If it's only practice, the country risks being wiped out because the neighbors, greedy, violent and cruel, have no qualms about slaughtering those poor unfortunates who refuse to defend themselves. Nonviolence is a philosophy individually valid, ie for someone who wants to tame his personality and evolve more rapidly giving all its material interests, but does not solve the problem of war in the world. A people who decide not to defend himself, when all diplomatic efforts have failed to avoid a conflict, it will be quickly wiped out politically, economically and physically. order to become truly effective, the philosophy of non violence must be collective, global, and not only remain in the minds of some ideal, otherwise nothing will really change.
- Some problems can not really be solved except on a world scale. Take Gandhi's philosophy of non-violence, for example. It bore fruit in historical Particular Conditions, But, on the whole, non-violence is dangerous for a country. If it is the only country to practise it, it risks being wiped out, for any of its neighbours who are greedy, violent or cruel will have no qualms about massacring the poor wretches who refuse to defend themselves. Non-violence is a philosophy which is good individually, that is to say, for those who want to tame their personality and evolve more quickly by renouncing all their material interests, but it does not solve the problem of war globally. When all diplomatic attempts to avoid a conflict have failed, a country that decides not to defend itself will soon be wiped out, politically, economically and physically.
For the philosophy of non-violence to become really effective, it has to become collective, world-wide, and not just remain in the minds of a few idealists, otherwise nothing will really change. - A number of problems can be effectively solved only at the global level. Take for example the philosophy of nonviolence of Gandhi: Under certain conditions, its historical has borne fruit, but in general, non-violence for a country dangerous. If it be practiced as the only non-violence, it risks destroyed, because the greedy, violent, cruel neighbors have no compunction about massacring those poor unfortunates who refuse to defend themselves. The violence at the individual level is a good philosophy, for someone to tame his personality and wants to develop faster, by refraining from all his material interests, but it does not solve the problem of war in the world. When all diplomatic efforts to avoid a conflict have failed, is a nation that decides to defend his policy quickly, economically and physically destroyed.
To be truly effective, the philosophy of nonviolence are collectively accepted and internationally, it must not just in the minds of some idealists exist, otherwise will not change anything really. - Un certain nombre de Problèmes ne peuvent être vraiment résolus qu’à l’échelle mondiale. Prenons la philosophie de Gandhi, par exemple, la non-violence : elle a porté ses fruits dans certaines conditions historiques, mais d’une façon générale la non-violence est dangereuse pour un pays. S’il est le seul à la pratiquer, il risque d’être anéanti, car les voisins, cupides, violents, cruels, n’auront aucun scrupule à massacrer ces pauvres malheureux qui refusent de se défendre. La non-violence est une philosophie qui est bonne individuellement, c’est-à-dire pour quelqu’un qui veut dompter sa personnalité et évoluer plus rapidement en renonçant à tous ses intérêts material, but it does not solve the problem of war in the world. If all diplomatic attempts to avoid a conflict have failed, a people who decided not to defend themselves will be quickly destroyed, politically, economically and physically.
order to become truly effective, it requires that the philosophy of non-violence becomes collective, global, it does not remain only in the minds of a few idealists, otherwise nothing will really change. - certosa Há problemas podem ser só as resolvidos to escala mundial. Gandhi has Consideremos filosofia, por exemplo, nao-violencia: she has borne fruit in certain historical circumstances, but, in general, non-violence is dangerous for a country. If it is the only one to do it, it will risk being wiped out because the neighbors jealous, violent, cruel, will have no compunction in massacring those bastards who refuse to defend themselves. Nonviolence is a good philosophy alone, that is, for someone who wants to have control over your personality and evolve more rapidly renouncing all material interests, but does not solve the problem of war in the world. If all diplomatic efforts failed to prevent a conflict, a people who decide not defend themselves will be quickly destroyed, political, economic and physically.
To become truly effective, it is necessary that the philosophy of nonviolence become legal world, it is necessary that it not only in the minds of some idealistic, but nothing will truly change.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Where Can I Buy Chicken Wings In Bulk
Nonviolence - the conditions Suitable for Applying it / Non-violence - conditions that it is applicable
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment